NB vs WB

Free and Open Source Engine Management discussions excluding more specific things on this board.
Marek0086
DIP8 - Involved
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:26 pm

NB vs WB

Post by Marek0086 »

Is it true that NB and WB sensors are the same... and its just the controller circuitry thats different?
malcom2073
LQFP112 - Up with the play
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 4:17 pm
Location: Shrewsbury PA
Contact:

Re: NB vs WB

Post by malcom2073 »

Marek0086
DIP8 - Involved
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Marek0086 »

What are your thoughts on "tuning devices" that use a narrow band sensor?. Can a NB be "offset" to measure between, say, 12.0:1 and 13.0:1 ??
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15409
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Fred »

NB i useless except for keeping catalytic converters happy by oscillating them back and forth past stoich...
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
malcom2073
LQFP112 - Up with the play
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 4:17 pm
Location: Shrewsbury PA
Contact:

Re: NB vs WB

Post by malcom2073 »

Marek0086 wrote:What are your thoughts on "tuning devices" that use a narrow band sensor?. Can a NB be "offset" to measure between, say, 12.0:1 and 13.0:1 ??
Nope. They're pretty much only useful for an ECU (typically stock, aftermarket closed loop use should WB anyway) to maintain a stoich AFR during normal (not WOT/idle) closed loop operations.
Marek0086
DIP8 - Involved
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Marek0086 »

What are your thoughts on "tuning devices" that use NB sensors?
Last edited by Marek0086 on Tue May 05, 2015 9:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15409
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Fred »

malcom2073 wrote:Nope. They're pretty much only useful for an ECU (typically stock, aftermarket closed loop use should WB anyway) to maintain a stoich AFR during normal (not WOT/idle) closed loop operations.
That's not really true. They don't maintain stoich, they intentionally oscillate either side of stoich to make the catalytic converter work optimally. If they did want to maintain stoich, they couldn't do that either, swinging side to side is all they can do.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
Marek0086
DIP8 - Involved
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Marek0086 »

I don't think thats true. The only reason they swing back and forth is because of the OEM ECU, isn't it?. Im pretty sure they could stabilize an output if the AFR was stable at stoich.
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15409
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Fred »

Then you clearly don't understand how narrowbands work. Sorry I couldn't explain it to you.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
Marek0086
DIP8 - Involved
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: NB vs WB

Post by Marek0086 »

I have some idea. Why would the output swing back and forth... rich and lean... if the AFR is constant??
Locked