Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Andy's GM DIS centric hardware design! Also works as a fuel controller for EDIS and distributor applications.
User avatar
DeuceEFI
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:57 am
Location: Gosport, IN USA
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by DeuceEFI »

Crankshaft and Camshaft Position Sensor information:

Both are Hall Effect Sensors, the signals are digital HI/LO and I have attached the graph of the output signals over a complete firing order cycle.

Andy
Attachments
Crankshaft and Camshaft Timing Graph over time
Crankshaft and Camshaft Timing Graph over time
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15433
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by Fred »

Just to get this in quickly, and not having had time to reply to the previous posts, but although you CAN use a normal logic buffer for digital inputs, you're better off using a schmidtt trigger for noise immunity, consider this. Also, if you use the max9924/6 chips, you have the option of going VR later, though they are significantly more expensive than a normal IC.

For digital inputs you want 1k (or maybe lower) pull up and a small cap as well. This provides more noise immunity at the expense of top end frequency RPM, but if you size it right, it's got a negligible negative effect in the range that you need. This is assuming an open collector style drive, which is the norm with most of this stuff.

More later!

Fred.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15433
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by Fred »

DeuceEFI wrote:The FETs I chose for the injectors were originally what I pulled out of the GM ECU, manufacturer unknown and I haven't been able to cross reference the markings "435M9395" on DPAK footprint. They are logic level gates from my testing and drawing out their configuration from the original PCB that I pulled with the engine. In my testing with a 1k resistor from the CPU to the Gate with a 100k resistor to ground and the Source connected to ground it only pulls 50uA
Cool! Except the bit where you don't know what they are :-) Probably best to choose something else that is suitable instead, which leads to...
I found FQD12N20LTM 9Amp QFETs or VND5N07 5Amp OmniFETs that have the same DPAK footprint so they can be switched easily.
I believe VND5N07 is obsolete, and are you sure they are dpak and not d2pak? Consider the smaller one to save space :-) The other part you listed has an RDS on of 280milli Ohms at 10v gate voltage... it will generate quite a bit of heat. Plus it's unprotected. It is cheap, though. VNB14NV04 is a nice part in a dpak. Recommended by me :-) Up to you, though. If the footprints match, list whatever and decide later.
For the Fuel Pump relay out, I found a VNN1NV0413TR OmniFET rated at 1.7A in a SOT-223 footprint.
That's fine, beware of RDS on if you try to load it more heavily, though.
You and Dan have given me a lot of great information that I will incorporate in my design :-)
That's what it's all about :-)
I have also attached a pic of the car Jaguar is being designed for...
Too cool :-)

All of the cars/engines to run so far have something a bit special about them, but this one is probably the coolest :-)

Fred.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15433
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by Fred »

It's been pointed out to me that my advice re low uF values on the power supplies is not good. 47uF tants is a great choice. You can go lower depending upon which reg you use and how much you intend to take from it.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
User avatar
DeuceEFI
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:57 am
Location: Gosport, IN USA
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by DeuceEFI »

Fred wrote:VNB14NV04 is a nice part in a dpak. Recommended by me :-)
VNB14NV04 is a D2PAK package which is bigger than the VND14NV04 which is the same series in a DPAK package. I have revised my schematic and board layout to use the VND14NV04 for the Injectors and for the Fuel Pump relay FETs. Thanks for the suggestion! :-)

I have updated all the schematics and redesigned the board based on those suggestions. I have updated the files on https://github.com/DeuceEFI/Jaguar

Let me know your thoughts...

Andy
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15433
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by Fred »

My apologies on the B/D thing. You're on the right track :-)

Will review the schematic next time it's not cold enough to freeze the balls off of a brass monkey.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15433
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by Fred »

Nope, your schem PDF claims to be on it's side and corrupt/broken. Perhaps regenerate it? The previous one was OK. Checked on both mac and linux.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
User avatar
DeuceEFI
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:57 am
Location: Gosport, IN USA
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by DeuceEFI »

Sorry about that, I'll get a new PDF generated shortly.

Thanks for letting me know :-)
User avatar
DeuceEFI
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:57 am
Location: Gosport, IN USA
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by DeuceEFI »

Jaguar-Schematic.pdf has been updated on github.com.

I have also ordered some free samples from st.com from their OMNIFET-II and OMNIFET-III lines for prototype testing.

My samples orders from te.com (Tyco Electronics) have started to come in, just waiting on the connectors for the case/board... So far I only have the wiring harness connector and the female pins to crimp the wires to.

The case that I'm going to use is made by Context Engineering Co. ( http://contextengineering.com ), Part # 3008H-5B which fits the 3" x 5" circuit board at 8 different levels plus they also have a Part # 4006-6B which fits a 4"x 6" circuit board at 6 different levels. Both give me the ability for an additional add on card if necessary in the future.

Thanks it for this update :-)
User avatar
DeuceEFI
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:57 am
Location: Gosport, IN USA
Contact:

Re: Project JAGuar for FreeEMS

Post by DeuceEFI »

DeuceEFI wrote:Crankshaft and Camshaft Position Sensor information:

Both are Hall Effect Sensors, the signals are digital HI/LO and I have attached the graph of the output signals over a complete firing order cycle.

Andy
I will be feeding both of these inputs (crankshaft and camshaft) sensors thru a MAX9926UAEE+ chip that I just happened to have ordered a free sample from Maxim IC this past July, so no worries about testing...

Also I am in the process of updating the BOM file called Jaguar.ods which will also track the remaining components that I need to purchase once we have finalized my design so I can start the prototype process.
Post Reply