FreeEMS design guideline
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:04 am
I have few ideas for guidelines to follow when submitting designs.
There would be two categories: Release and Experimental/development. Release designs would be published on the main website, while experimental would only be available though development forums until transcendence or merger into release designs.
For release category, several goals should be met:
-No ERC issues with the schematics.
-Extensive documentation on the board included in the data download.(level of details still to be worked out, explaining every single component might not be purposeful)
-Full schematics, PCB's and BOM available. Preferably the gerber files should be available too.
-Board sizes under 100x160mm, under 100x80mm preferably, except for "exotic" boards.
-Multi layered and SMD boards only in conjunction with 2-layer through hole designs.
-Brief description for quick reference, more detailed for additional information
-Designs submitted for release will be peer reviewed before acceptance to Release category
I don't think the actual designer files would be required, since there are several different EDA packages available and for the most parts they aren't compatible.
The development files would have different goals:
-No ERC requirements until board design phase
-Incremental documentation, only the changes/additions to be documented in the submission, and a referring link if beginning a new thread.
-If new components and footprints (ie. not present in distributed libraries) are added, full description of them.
-all designer files should be included in the submission
Order of preference in EDA designer software:
KiCAD: Open source, multiplatform (Linux, Win, MacOS X)
gEDA: Open Source, limited platform (Linux, MacOS X)
Other packages with appropriate licenses. Note that Eagle is free for non-commercial use, so strictly speaking no board done with free eagle would be eligible to be kitted.
This is outlined proposal to hardware submission guidelines, it must be worked on still. Comments, suggestions?
There would be two categories: Release and Experimental/development. Release designs would be published on the main website, while experimental would only be available though development forums until transcendence or merger into release designs.
For release category, several goals should be met:
-No ERC issues with the schematics.
-Extensive documentation on the board included in the data download.(level of details still to be worked out, explaining every single component might not be purposeful)
-Full schematics, PCB's and BOM available. Preferably the gerber files should be available too.
-Board sizes under 100x160mm, under 100x80mm preferably, except for "exotic" boards.
-Multi layered and SMD boards only in conjunction with 2-layer through hole designs.
-Brief description for quick reference, more detailed for additional information
-Designs submitted for release will be peer reviewed before acceptance to Release category
I don't think the actual designer files would be required, since there are several different EDA packages available and for the most parts they aren't compatible.
The development files would have different goals:
-No ERC requirements until board design phase
-Incremental documentation, only the changes/additions to be documented in the submission, and a referring link if beginning a new thread.
-If new components and footprints (ie. not present in distributed libraries) are added, full description of them.
-all designer files should be included in the submission
Order of preference in EDA designer software:
KiCAD: Open source, multiplatform (Linux, Win, MacOS X)
gEDA: Open Source, limited platform (Linux, MacOS X)
Other packages with appropriate licenses. Note that Eagle is free for non-commercial use, so strictly speaking no board done with free eagle would be eligible to be kitted.
This is outlined proposal to hardware submission guidelines, it must be worked on still. Comments, suggestions?