The preliminary board layout. 6 sockets for LM1949s, 1 socket for a MAX9927 soldered onto a SSOP to DIP adapter.

The J35A3 with 6spd manual transmission.

No, this isn't true at all. You'll definitely be able to blame me :-) http://issues.freeems.org at your service for that.Peter wrote:At least if it doesn't run very well with Free-ems, I'll be the only one to blame
This is true, yes!and should be correctable if I want to spend the time to figure it out.
Don't feel bad about it. Tomorrow I get DSL, if you'd like to have a chat on the phone to better understand it, we can arrange that easily. I have access to a US voip server, or there is skype.My biggest problem with this project is the software. I've spent a fair amount of time trying to understand the source code, and it's beyond me.
I'm here for you! At least some of the time :-)So hopefully(crossing my fingers) Fred will have the time to provide plenty of user support.
One comment, you've read this, right? : viewtopic.php?f=54&t=1084The preliminary board layout. 6 sockets for LM1949s, 1 socket for a MAX9927 soldered onto a SSOP to DIP adapter.
I'm thinking fuel only with semi sequential injection to start with. As long as I'm going to set a board up it should be able to be easily upgradeable to "better"/different methods of injection.Fred wrote:What is your plan? Are you waiting on support for more pins? Or going wasted/semi seq? Or what?
They're Xcelite model 110cg. They use to have a little spring that opened them, but I've used them so much that the spring broke. I didn't actually buy it. I found them in a box in my parents basement, and I'm pretty sure they belonged to my grandpa. It has a flush cutter, and the hinge takes a lot of abuse crimping smash connectors and cutting wires that are too big for it and it's still tight. By far the best dikes I own.Fred wrote:What is the brand, model and cost of your side cutters, they look lovely, I'm jealous! Are they flush cut? How stable is the hinge?
It's your forum you can organize it however you like, because I don't really care. It would be nice if the comment threads would stick with it's topic threads in the index. Maybe in like an indented subsection so that it's easier to find the matching thread without having to open the thread and then click on the link.Fred wrote:I hope you don't mind me posting in here. I can split it into a comments thread if you'd prefer.
My biggest problem is that I can't get the source code to compile even though it builds just fine. Generally when I'm trying to understand somebody's code, I comment things out so that the compiler will show me everything that it using that header file.Fred wrote:Don't feel bad about it. Tomorrow I get DSL, if you'd like to have a chat on the phone to better understand it, we can arrange that easily. I have access to a US voip server, or there is skype.
I'm using FB to host my pictures, and I posted it on here so it's already in the public domain.Fred wrote:I stole your photo for the FB DIY HW album. I hope that was OK.
Peter wrote:I'm thinking fuel only with semi sequential injection to start with. As long as I'm going to set a board up it should be able to be easily upgradeable to "better"/different methods of injection.
Thank you! :-)They're Xcelite model 110cg. <snip> By far the best dikes I own.
I'll leave it as one, then. Can split later if you decide you'd like to.It's your forum you can organize it however you like, because I don't really care. It would be nice if the comment threads would stick with it's topic threads in the index.
This seems to contradict itself? :-)My biggest problem is that I can't get the source code to compile even though it builds just fine.
There is an easier way: http://docs.freeems.org/doxygen-html/df ... ce_8h.htmlthe compiler will show me everything that it using that header file.
I knew, and know the legality behind it, but it's still polite to ask.I'm using FB to host my pictures, and I posted it on here so it's already in the public domain.
OkFred wrote:If you're going fuel only, you can and may as well go sequential right off the bat.
The files get made if I follow your instructions(cd into src and then make all), but if I include all the files in a project in a C compiler like Java or CW it won't compile.Fred wrote:This seems to contradict itself?
I hadn't found this, but it does look very helpful.Fred wrote:There is an easier way: http://docs.freeems.org/doxygen-html/df ... ce_8h.html
Ya, JB2 is cut, and R5 has a wire bridging it on the bottom side of the board. Right now the PLL values are 3.32k 1%, 6.9nF, and 680pF because that's what I had available. I assume those values are close enough?Fred wrote:BTW, have you seen this: viewtopic.php?f=62&t=1315 ? At the least, you should swap R5 for a jumper.
If I was worried about it being shared I won't post it was my point, but thanks for asking.Fred wrote:I knew, and know the legality behind it, but it's still polite to ask.
That would be the problem. I thought about any good C compiler would at least try to get the job done.Fred wrote:neither of which are compatible with GCC C
Too late.Fred wrote:I'd leave them alone if they're working for you.
Cool :-)Peter wrote:I made a little bit of progress today.
No, if we decide to try stuff later, you can add it pretty easily, so KISS for now.Do I need a VR sensor "trickery" circuit like the one in the Ravage schematics?
Correct.Do I want to use PT2-7 or PB0-5 for my injectors? Would it be safe to assume I can use the same pins for the same sensors as the Ravage does?
Edit: I'm going to go with PT2-7 based on http://issues.freeems.org/view.php?id=190
You're thinking slightly wrongly. Intake to the engine, not into the turbo. MAT is currently unused, it's there to provide for a more sophisticated way of handling hot starts later. IAT is the one you want connected, and for a boosted app, the best place for the hardware is in the output tank or first tube of the intercooler on or near the front of the car with good ambient airflow, and not much radiant heat from exhausts and so on. I need to do an article on this as I've delivered this advice too many times.Edit2: Ravage has an Intake Air Temperature circuit and a Manifold Air Temp circuit. I'm thinking that an IAT sensor is fairly pointless if you're boosting the engine.
Consider a small one for analogue stuff on top of your TA card rather than redoing everything? Or migrate the low Z stuff onto its own board. If you take all the low z stuff away to another box (in the engine bay if you want) then all you need is a line driver chip to push signal to it, this doesn't take much space at all. You'll sort something out, no doubt. I like how neat and tidy your efforts are :-) Reminds me of me.I'm starting to think I need a little bit bigger board.