Page 2 of 2

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 2:53 am
by Hayseed
On an air-cooled MS2 mower engine I screwed a small aluminum block to the head and drilled and tapped it for a Ford coolant temp sensor. It has worked fine.

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 8:18 am
by Fred
Got a photo of that setup? I'm curious :-)

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:11 pm
by Hayseed
CHT Sensor: (the attachment bolt for the aluminum block is on the same axis as the sensor and hidden by the sensor once installed)
CHT.jpg
Overall engine:
OA1.jpg
24-1 crank wheel:
crank.jpg

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:15 pm
by Hayseed
Cam Hall sensor: (running sequential injection, sensing intake valve retainer)
cam.jpg
Fuel Pump:
pump1.jpg
Pump cannister filled by original engine mounted pulse pump:
pump2.jpg

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:20 pm
by Hayseed
Injector:
inj1.jpg
FPR:
fpr.jpg

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:52 pm
by Fred
Hmm, I guess reality is that you're typically at a fixed temperature pre-starting, and it would be accurate there. From there up, it would lag reality a bit more than a lower-inertia, closer-coupled setup, but you could account for that discrepancy by under-fueling compared to a different measure. And if you always started from cold, it'd track out fine anyway. The more lag that sensor has, the further it is from what the engine really needs, you can't really compensate for it everywhere, but it's likely not enough to care about, either. Cheers.

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:54 am
by Hayseed
Sensor response speed has been a non-issue thus far in operation (~3 years). In this instance, "close enough" seems to have been close enough! ;)

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:08 am
by Fred
Understood. But we're not here to aim for mediocrity; there is another project excelling in that arena. We're here to aim for the stars, and fall short with a full understanding of the problem.

Re: Impregacy's "Moar" 1991 Ingersoll 3012

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:01 pm
by Hayseed
Mediocrity = bad.
This "other project" of which you speak, sounds bad.
Go Fred, go! :D