Two drives, first me, then Rob. Two logs, first mine, then his. Fired up from cold pretty easily after sitting for weeks :-)
A few of random shifts for me, in seconds:
6037 - 5525 = 0.512 / 6183 - 5525 =
0.658, difference =
0.146
18765 - 18342 = 0.423 / 18966 - 18342 =
0.624, difference =
0.201
9487 - 9066 = 0.421 / 9772 - 9066 =
0.706, difference =
0.285
CBF doing any more, and a couple of Rob's:
8067 - 7501 = 0.566 / 8532 - 7501 =
1.031, difference =
0.465
16404 - 15953 = 0.451 / 16889 - 15953 =
0.936, difference =
0.485
Which are measured by first non-100% TPS to first 100% TPS method. Which is wrong. Now i'll look at the times between first non 100% TPS and peak low RPM post shift (clutch fully reengaged). So the clutch was suffering for the difference between the two. 0.15 to 0.3 seconds for me, and 0.47 seconds for Rob. Amazing how different it sounded! Numbers aren't that different.
Screenshots showing the difference in style with the intermediate RPM increase that the clutch had to drag back down. Interesting stuff :-) Sorry for selling you out, man! :-D To be fair, he was probably trying to be gentle to the poor thing. Just too eager to get back on the gas before the synchros and/or clutch had finished. :-)
Logs are attached if anyone wants to poke around themselves. Annoying to retrace the above due to multiple instances of those stamps in the logs. It'd be nice if there were milli and 8th milli traces automatically generated. Could be arranged.