boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post your project vehicles here! One thread per vehicle please.
User avatar
BenFenner
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by BenFenner »

Regarding rev limiter hysteresis. I love my 25 RPM hysteresis. It's smooth as butter and a good compromise between the jarring OEM style and the spooky, almost imperceptible behavior of what I imagine a 0.5 RPM hysteresis might be like.
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15431
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by Fred »

Cool! Good to see another data point. 50 is pretty smooth if you bump it in gear. I had a 0 hyst limit on the hotel with a bug when I first ran it ages ago. That was a solid wall, no perceptible on/off behaviour, just sort of averaging the right number of sparks to keep the RPM constant :-)
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
User avatar
BenFenner
LQFP144 - On Top Of The Game
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by BenFenner »

FYI, I go back and forth on whether or not I think a smaller hysteresis is worse, better, or has no effect on the probability of valve float.

With a smaller hysteresis:
- On one hand you are hitting the rev limiter MANY more times than you used to be. Quadruply so because it feels so smooth. And hitting any "hard" rev limiter causes backlash in the valvetrain which can cause valve float where you otherwise might not have experienced it. This backlash happening at very high RPM is the worst time to experience it. Just because it feels "smooth" doesn't mean the engine isn't more prone to failure.
- On the other hand the backlash could be to a lesser degree and for less time with a smaller hysteresis? It feels good, maybe it is good? With extremely small RPM values (less than 10 or so) it may cross a threshold that actually eliminates backlash altogether?

If you are running an interference engine, you should at least be aware of the potential consequences of modifying this parameter.
User avatar
Fred
Moderator
Posts: 15431
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Home sweet home!
Contact:

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by Fred »

If there is any "backlash" (not sure what you mean by this) then it's the same as suddenly lifting off completely from WOT. At cranking RPM you can see the speed variation between firing events. But at higher RPM it's all but completely gone, averaged out by inertia. Hitting a smooth wall and randomly dropping sparks to maintain an exact RPM has to be almost perfectly smooth, with the exception of jitter in the RPM signal causing it to not be a perfect wall.

As for valve float, if your limiter is set anywhere near that, you're doing it wrong :-D Last time I got some valve float it was at ~5000 RPM with a stock single-port 60s VW flat four :-D

Thinking again there will be subtle variations to cross the zero threshold. The granularity being limited by cylinder force and inertia of the flywheel. Maybe dropping a single spark event has a large effect, and bringing it back, likewise. IE, enough to push past the limit level by some quantity, or fall below it by some quantity (likely not this, but the other could be significant).

Fred.
DIYEFI.org - where Open Source means Open Source, and Free means Freedom
FreeEMS.org - the open source engine management system
FreeEMS dev diary and its comments thread and my turbo truck!
n00bs, do NOT PM or email tech questions! Use the forum!
The ever growing list of FreeEMS success stories!
boostedcabbage
QFP80 - Contributor
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 5:51 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by boostedcabbage »

Received some things in the mail today.

Image
boostedcabbage
QFP80 - Contributor
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 5:51 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by boostedcabbage »

boostedcabbage
QFP80 - Contributor
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 5:51 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by boostedcabbage »

Update:

Pulling engine

Image

#3 Rod is bent from a fuel hydrolock.. I had an injector stay open from a failed FET

Image

Pistons and rods removed

Image

Wiseco pistons and Eagle rods installed. ~9.1:1 CR

Image

Painted the transmission for fun

Image

Built a welding table as I don't have one. Not the most spectacular thing, but it works

Image

Engine as it stands currently

Image

More updates coming soon
exric
TO220 - Visibile
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:32 am

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by exric »

nice job on that dodge
I have a 1998 Grand Cherokee so it is good to see someone work on a dodge.
boostedcabbage
QFP80 - Contributor
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 5:51 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by boostedcabbage »

Image

Image

Image

(Still have to widen the ports)

Image


More updates soon.
boostedcabbage
QFP80 - Contributor
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 5:51 pm

Re: boostedcabbage's 1995 Dodge Neon

Post by boostedcabbage »

Image
Post Reply