This might be familiar to you already, but I just come up with this.
The larger is the LSU 4.2. The difference is huge.
Which you think will act faster in heater controller wise in variable conditions where temperature fluctuations can be several hundred degrees centigrade? I bet both will measure the same in some test tube, but real world might differ.
Interesting, though I'd expect the lighter weight element to be more at the mercy of the exhaust flow and speed of the heater control logic, not the other way around. Perhaps that is why the spec it to be higher frequency, IE, such that if you stick to their recommendations you have a hope in hell of controlling it properly.
I also believe that the heater control frequency is not higher only because of the chip but physics. Larger mass requires longer periods to cool down and to heat hence lower frequency. If the heater control frequency would be trivial, it wouldn't be in the datasheet.
See above. Perhaps this is a language issue, again. This type of comparison with minimal variables is the way to roll, though. It would be cool if Alan did a 4.2 vs 4.9 test with his controller each tuned optimally, but fundamentally the same, except the sensor and tuning. Then we'd have a real world "which one is faster" test. Both for temperature change and for gas flow change and combinations of the two. Comparing two sensors with two controllers in an unknown gas flow and drawing conclusions about the sensor alone is brain dead, to say the least.
It is so obvious that you judge people by whether they can speak good English.
No, I don't. Some of my good friends are very average in their English usage. Would I want them writing code for me, no, but they are my friends all the same.
Bosch Engineers at Germany invented the LSU sensors, which you have to use. They do not necessarily speak good English.
Have you BEEN to Germany? I have. I've spent enough time there to know what level of English to expect from an average German and a highly educated German. I even have German friends in New Zealand and Kiwi friends in Germany. Furthermore, employees who work in large multinational corporations regularly conduct business in English as it's the common exchange format, just as it is on this forum. I bet you a million monopoly dollars that they did.
You EDIT member's post at your will
Let's clarify this statement a little. I did three things earlier today with respect edits:
1) Put your attack back into your post with clearly marked EDIT comments such that it was clear what I put in there and what you put in there. I did this to expose you for what you are. Your original content remains untouched.
2) Removed an extremely long one-piece quote that only disrupted the flow of the thread and was not referenced at all from another post. I marked this as well such that it was clear that I'd done it. I didn't touch the other content in that post despite it being in violation of the rules of the forum.
3) Removed all links back to your site such that you don't gain any sort of google ranking through having posted here. I marked these too and left them accessible via manual copy/paste.
Did I edit, as in change, the content of your posts? NO! Don't attempt to misrepresent the truth with me, I will put you in your place swiftly, I promise.
you change member's post rights at your will.
It costs me time to make such changes, so I generally do not. The fact that the content that another member had quoted to me while I was sleeping was gone before I woke up annoyed me. The fact that you have three accounts on here annoyed me. The fact that you had the nerve to ask me to mask your dishonesty and change the post authors to you also annoyed me. Lastly, you have NO rights here. No one does. Only privileges that you LOST by way of your gutter-level antics. You're still free to post, just not edit. This is no one's fault, but your own. You made the bed, now lay in it.
You like to play English language games, that's where your professionalism stays.
No, absolutely not. I've played no language games in here with you. My professionalism stays with writing truly excellent software of all types, and ensuring that the hardware associated with that software is also of the highest quality. I care about little other than this and the difference between right and wrong, which you're currently in the process of learning. This thread is the third link when you google "alm wideband" without the quotes. It's bound to hurt your business and that seems right and fair to me, and likely others too.
I decide not to respond to your post any more.